Independent technical assessment
A written expert verdict on the technical claim you cannot verify yourself.
Fermiq provides independent technical due-diligence memos on quantum computing and satellite / Earth-observation claims. Investors, funds and family offices commission a short, paid, written opinion from a researcher with genuine frontier credentials — and receive it in five business days.
No meetings, no retainer, no ongoing engagement. One question, one memo, one verdict.
Who it is for
Built for the moment a claim outruns your ability to check it
You are evaluating a deal, a technical assertion in a data room, or a satellite dataset whose methodology decides whether the numbers mean anything. Your team can read the market, the cap table and the contracts. It cannot referee a fidelity benchmark or a methane retrieval.
That is the gap Fermiq fills: an assessment written by someone who works at the frontier in question, with no stake in the outcome.
Domains
Two fields, covered properly
Quantum computing
Qubit counts, error rates, gate fidelities, error-correction roadmaps, claimed speedups and benchmark selection. We separate what a device has demonstrated from what a slide implies it will demonstrate.
Satellite & Earth observation
Sensor capability, retrieval methodology, validation practice and uncertainty budgets — including methane monitoring, where detection limits and attribution claims are frequently stated more firmly than the data supports.
Outside these two fields we decline rather than improvise.
How it works
Three steps, five business days
- 01
Submit a claim or a document
A deck, a technical claim, a dataset methodology, or a specific diligence question.
- 02
Matched to the right researcher
We confirm scope, turnaround and any conflict of interest within one business day, or decline.
- 03
Written verdict delivered
A structured memo within five business days, or 48 hours on the rush tier. No meetings required.
Credibility
Who writes the memos
Fermiq's researchers are physicists and data scientists with doctoral research backgrounds at leading European institutions, several still holding active academic positions. Some also hold operating roles — including scientific advisory positions at Earth-observation ventures and technical roles in space investment.
We do not name specific institutions, companies or individuals on this site as a matter of course. Where a named affiliation is relevant to your assessment, it is disclosed to you directly, in the memo. [Placeholder: add approved named affiliations here once cleared.]